You must be 18+ to view this content

[Five-Legged Mares] Futa Artpack may contain content you must be 18+ to view.

Are you 18 years of age or older?

or Return to itch.io

Comments

Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.

(-6)

Zooaphiles

so much for zip's now a days this is in rar i didnt even notice til i went to open it up any justification for not using zip just curiousity

(+1)

most likely because winrar is so popular to use. 

(+3)

Just a heads up, for anybody gonna publish an art pack, be sure to tag the art pack tag under your advertisements, I really love to purchase many pony art packs but nobody knows they need to advertise them on derpibooru first for many pony fans to be noticed. I almost missed this one.

(2 edits) (+2)(-15)

Contains EQG. This should have been disclosed in the advertising. Had I known I would not have purchased. This is deceiving advertising at best.

Thanks 4 the warning.

(+7)(-1)

Hello there! I am sorry to hear that is how you feel about the art pack.

However, Sunset Shimmer and Wallflower Blush being in the art pack have been disclosed in the description above, and both of them are in non-ayylmao pony form, accurate to the advertisement.

I hope that clears things up a bit, thank you.

(+2)(-11)

You advertised the pack as having no ">no hooves"  content. This was not accurate. The only reason I purchased this pack was to support the creation of more FiM packs into the future. You have deceived me on the sole reason for buying.

In thread you specifically said "But do you hate those gosh-darn >nohooves?". I very much do hate them. But this statement was intentionally misleading.

There is literally no ">no hooves" content. You can pontificate about EqG, but saying that there's ">no hooves" is objectively wrong. Every single character in every single image in the pack has four hooves.

M8, how about you read, esepcially on the image. EQG in most cases refers exclusively to the "humanoid" versions of the ponies. Just because a character from EQG is in the pack doesn't magically make it false advertising. As long as they are ponified at the very least, have 4 hooves, etc, then boom, it's valid. You're also intentionally misinterpreting the advertising. "Don't you hate those >nohooves" aka, don't you hate the "ponies" with no hooves. Not advertising that there's "no hooves". Please, if you're gonna act like this, at least take it to Twitter where even less people care.